openstack/nova
Code Issues Proposed changes

Fix nits in nested provider allocation candidates(2)

Browse Source 
Addresses the following minor/nonblocking review comments from earlier
in this series:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567508/18/nova/api/openstack/placement/objects/resource_provider.py@2887
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567508/18/nova/api/openstack/placement/objects/resource_provider.py@2930

Change-Id: Idb3ea72001121ef67f7a577533a04363c48171dd
This commit is contained in:
Tetsuro Nakamura 2018-05-29 01:47:01 +09:00
parent f9a419e40f
commit cdfee395fa
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
nova/api/openstack/placement/objects/resource_provider.py
View File

@ -2883,8 +2883,10 @@ def _get_trees_matching_all(ctx, resources, required_traits, forbidden_traits,
only provider with enough inventory of SRIOV_NET_VF but it does not have
the required HW_NIC_OFFLOAD_GENEVE trait).
:note: This function is used for scenarios that do NOT involve sharing
providers AND where there are nested providers present in the deployment.
:note: This function is used for scenarios to get results for a
RequestGroup with use_same_provider=False. In this scenario, we are able
to use multiple providers within the same provider tree including sharing
providers to satisfy different resources involved in a single RequestGroup.
:param ctx: Session context to use
:param resources: A dict, keyed by resource class ID, of the amount
@ -2927,7 +2929,8 @@ def _get_trees_matching_all(ctx, resources, required_traits, forbidden_traits,
if sharing_providers:
# There are sharing providers for this resource class, so we
# should also get combinations of (sharing provider, anchor root)
# in addition to (nested provider, anchor root) we already have.
# in addition to (non-sharing provider, anchor root) we already
# have.
rc_provs_with_inv = _anchors_for_sharing_providers(
ctx, sharing_providers, get_id=True)
rc_provs_with_inv = set(