ceilometer/doc/source/contributor/architecture.rst
gord chung ebb1fd5930 doc: move old dev docs to contributor section
Change-Id: I8d1fdd540577c318f7d041ddcfdccab3d979ad55
2017-07-18 19:45:53 +00:00

208 lines
7.5 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _architecture:
=====================
System Architecture
=====================
.. index::
single: agent; architecture
double: compute agent; architecture
double: data store; architecture
double: database; architecture
High-Level Architecture
=======================
.. The source for the following diagram can be found at: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1XiOiaq9zI_DIpxY1tlkysg9VAEw2r8aYob0bjG71pNg/edit?usp=sharing
.. figure:: ./ceilo-arch.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Architecture summary
An overall summary of Ceilometer's logical architecture.
Each of Ceilometer's services are designed to scale horizontally. Additional
workers and nodes can be added depending on the expected load. Ceilometer
offers two core services:
1. polling agent - daemon designed to poll OpenStack services and build Meters.
2. notification agent - daemon designed to listen to notifications on message queue,
convert them to Events and Samples, and apply pipeline actions.
Data normalised and collected by Ceilometer can be sent to various targets.
Gnocchi_ was developed to capture measurement data in a time series format to
optimise storage and querying. Gnocchi is intended to replace the existing
metering database interface. Additionally, Aodh_ is the alarming service which
can send alerts when user defined rules are broken. Lastly, Panko_ is the event
storage project designed to capture document-oriented data such as logs and
system event actions.
.. _Gnocchi: http://gnocchi.xyz/
.. _Aodh: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/aodh
.. _Panko: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/panko
Gathering the data
==================
How is data collected?
----------------------
.. figure:: ./1-agents.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Collectors and agents
This is a representation of how the collectors and agents gather data from
multiple sources.
The Ceilometer project created 2 methods to collect data:
1. :term:`Notification agent` which takes messages generated on the
notification bus and transforms them into Ceilometer samples or events. This
is **the preferred method** of data collection. If you are working on some
OpenStack related project and are using the Oslo library, you are kindly
invited to come and talk to one of the project members to learn how you
could quickly add instrumentation for your project.
2. :term:`Polling agents`, which is the less preferred method, will poll
some API or other tool to collect information at a regular interval.
The polling approach is less preferred due to the load it can impose
on the API services.
The first method is supported by the ceilometer-notification agent, which
monitors the message queues for notifications. Polling agents can be configured
either to poll the local hypervisor or remote APIs (public REST APIs exposed by
services and host-level SNMP/IPMI daemons).
Notification Agents: Listening for data
---------------------------------------
.. index::
double: notifications; architecture
.. figure:: ./2-1-collection-notification.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Notification agents
Notification agents consuming messages from services.
The heart of the system is the notification daemon (agent-notification)
which monitors the message queue for data sent by other OpenStack
components such as Nova, Glance, Cinder, Neutron, Swift, Keystone, and Heat,
as well as Ceilometer internal communication.
The notification daemon loads one or more *listener* plugins, using the
namespace ``ceilometer.notification``. Each plugin can listen to any topic,
but by default, will listen to ``notifications.info``,
``notifications.sample``, and ``notifications.error``. The listeners grab
messages off the configured topics and redistributes them to the appropriate
plugins(endpoints) to be processed into Events and Samples.
Sample-oriented plugins provide a method to list the event types they're interested
in and a callback for processing messages accordingly. The registered name of the
callback is used to enable or disable it using the pipeline of the notification
daemon. The incoming messages are filtered based on their event type value before
being passed to the callback so the plugin only receives events it has
expressed an interest in seeing.
.. _polling:
Polling Agents: Asking for data
-------------------------------
.. index::
double: polling; architecture
.. figure:: ./2-2-collection-poll.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Polling agents
Polling agents querying services for data.
Polling for compute resources is handled by a polling agent running
on the compute node (where communication with the hypervisor is more
efficient), often referred to as the compute-agent. Polling via
service APIs for non-compute resources is handled by an agent running
on a cloud controller node, often referred to the central-agent.
A single agent can fulfill both roles in an all-in-one deployment.
Conversely, multiple instances of an agent may be deployed, in
which case the workload is shared. The polling agent
daemon is configured to run one or more *pollster* plugins using any
combination of ``ceilometer.poll.compute``, ``ceilometer.poll.central``, and
``ceilometer.poll.ipmi`` namespaces
The frequency of polling is controlled via the pipeline configuration. See
:ref:`Pipeline-Configuration` for details. The agent framework then passes the
generated samples to the notification agent for processing.
Processing the data
===================
.. _multi-publisher:
Pipeline Manager
----------------
.. figure:: ./3-Pipeline.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Ceilometer pipeline
The assembly of components making the Ceilometer pipeline.
Ceilometer offers the ability to take data gathered by the agents, manipulate
it, and publish it in various combinations via multiple pipelines. This
functionality is handled by the notification agents.
Transforming the data
---------------------
.. figure:: ./4-Transformer.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Transformer example
Example of aggregation of multiple cpu time usage samples in a single
cpu percentage sample.
The data gathered from the polling and notifications agents contains a wealth
of data and if combined with historical or temporal context, can be used to
derive even more data. Ceilometer offers various transformers which can be used
to manipulate data in the pipeline.
Publishing the data
-------------------
.. figure:: ./5-multi-publish.png
:width: 100%
:align: center
:alt: Multi-publish
This figure shows how a sample can be published to multiple destinations.
Currently, processed data can be published using 7 different transports:
1. gnocchi, which publishes samples/events to Gnocchi API;
2. notifier, a notification based publisher which pushes samples to a message queue
which can be consumed by an external system;
3. udp, which publishes samples using UDP packets;
4. http, which targets a REST interface;
5. kafka, which publishes data to a Kafka message queue to be consumed by any system
that supports Kafka.
6. file, which publishes samples to a file with specified name and location;
7. database, which stores samples to the legacy ceilometer database system.
Storing/Accessing the data
==========================
Ceilometer is designed solely to generate and normalise cloud data. The data
created by Ceilometer can be pushed to any number of target using publishers
mentioned in :ref:`pipeline-publishers` section. The recommended workflow is to
push data to Gnocchi_ for efficient time-series storage and resource lifecycle
tracking.